|
Review
by Kozo: |
The concept was inspired, but the actual movie? Less so. 2010 Filmko Pictures release Don Quixote transplants Miguel de Cervantes classic Spanish literature to ancient China, and at first glance, it looks like a good idea. Guo Tao (Crazy Stone) plays the Chinese Don Quixote, a chronic dreamer whose love of fiction leads him to pursue a life of fantasy. Thinking that he’s meant to be a knight errant (or “wandering knight”), Quixote takes to road, seeking adventure, damsels in distress and, above all, justice.
Of course he’s totally off his rocker. Early on, Quixote comes across a peasant girl (Karena Lam, in what amounts to a wasted role for the talented actress) being kidnapped by a band of less-than-righteous soldiers, and Quixote immediate decides that she’s “Princess Fragrante,” even though her name is really Rosie. Quixote’s first duel versus the gang ends in a surprising win, though it’s luck rather than skill that gives him the “W.” Following that, Quixote recruits stalwart companion Sancho Panza (Wang Geng) before pursuing the kidnappers, leading to a grand adventure that subverts the world of jiang hu both cleverly and surprisingly. One would hope, anyway.
In the early going, genre subversion seems to be the goal of director Agan (Big Movie, Two Stupid Eggs), with Quixote used as a means of demonstrating the inherent ridiculousness of the martial arts movie. Wandering kung-fu masters are usually madmen, and honor is something that can be used to hoodwink the dimwitted. Don Quixote earns fame, but it’s mostly through luck and a confluence of selfish politics, unsubstantiated rumor and Quixote’s endearing but self-aggrandizing ego. The potential for satire here is huge, and the faux-fantasy setting puts Don Quixote on track to become a China version of The Princess Bride, i.e. partially funny, partially sweet and overall pretty smart.
Unfortunately, Agan is not a strong enough director to pull off that feat. He’s got the right template and the right actor (Guo Tao is delightfully dense in the lead role) to pull off a workable satire, but he can’t bring the story and characters to the proper places. The plot progresses flatly, without the crescendos needed to get the audience involved. Most of the time the satire is far too subdued, with occasional moments where it seems to attempt earnest emotion. Characters flip-flop egregiously; for example, Sancho Panza converts from a doubter to a believer in Quixote almost instantly, even though not much happens that warrants his change. Worst of all, the film never develops properly. It just limps along, turning revealing story points into flat exposition.
Even the anticipated sequences fall flat. The iconic “tilting at windmills” sequence is present and accounted for, and the CGI used is impressive. However, the scene comes off as a tech demo rather than a major story development or reveal, and many other set pieces suffer a similar fate. Don Quixote works best when it seems to reveal how little it takes to be a true martial arts hero, i.e. all it takes is chutzpah, luck and pretty good PR. The problem is the film doesn't concentrate on that theme, and travels from the funny to the puzzling to the woefully underdeveloped with little urgency, energy or surprise. Besides a good idea, a film needs structure and solid, skillful execution. Some pieces work, but the glue – in this case, probably Agan's direction - just isn't there to hold it all together. Don Quixote isn't a terrible movie, it just doesn't live to its very promising idea. (Kozo 2011)
|
|