|
Review by
Calvin
McMillin: |
How did it all come to
this? That's the unstated, but ever-present question
that lies at the heart of Peppermint Candy, the
second film from writer-turned-director Lee Chang-Dong.
His 1999 follow-up to Green Fish bears an intriguing
premise. Like Christopher Nolan's Memento (2000)
and Gaspar Noe's Irreversible (2002), Peppermint
Candy begins at the chronological "ending"
and works its way backwards. But Peppermint Candy
differs from the other two films in part due to its
epic scope, which chronicles twenty years in the life
of one man, divided into seven episodes, each of which
reveal new insights into how the character became the
man we meet in the opening scene.
The film kicks off in
the spring of 1999 as a sharp-dressed, but obviously
distraught man stumbles upon a high school reunion of
sorts that's taking place at a tranquil riverbank overlooked
by a railroad bridge. These revelers recognize the man
as Yong-Ho (Sul Kyung-Gu), a long-lost classmate that
they failed to get in touch with for this twenty-year
reunion. The people are generally friendly to Yong-Ho
and try to include him in the festivities, but the man
seems mentally disturbed. Soon enough, Yong-Ho reveals
his mental state by climbing the railroad track to await
his demise. With a train bearing down on him, Yong-Ho
shouts, "I wanna go back!" And in a manner
of speaking, he does just that. At the moment of impact,
the film freezes, then transitions to footage shot from
the back of a train moving in reverse. The film resets
three days prior to Yong-Ho's suicide, bringing the
viewer up to speed on what drove him to such a desperate
action.
We soon find that Yong-Ho
has lost just about everything: his wife, his child,
his job, his money, and as we will come to see, his
innocence and his one true love. In this portion of
the timeline, Yong-Ho has a final encounter with his
high school sweetheart, Sun-Im (Moon So-Ri), a meeting
that will push him over the edge. The film then flashes
back to other key moments in Yong-Ho's past, which help
illuminate his dark character. In these episodes, the
film delves into his unhappy marriage with Hong-Ja (Kim
Yeo-Jin), his brutal tactics while working for the police
department, and the life-changing incident that traumatized
Yong-Ho during his time in the military, just to name
a few. Eventually, the film reaches its chronological
"beginning" in 1979, returning to the setting
and the characters of the film's opening. We find those
very same reunion-goers, full of youthful exuberance,
as well as Sun-Im in the prime of her life. We also
find a youthful Yong-Ho, one so dramatically different
from the man we met at the start of the film. Armed
with all the knowledge of what will happen to this poor
character in the coming decades, viewers can only lament
the bittersweet, if not outright tragic fate of the
once-innocent Yong-Ho.
One of the more interesting
aspects of Peppermint Candy's backwards structure
is the fact that it can be read in at least two different
ways. On one hand, it can be seen simply as a device
imposed on the narrative from outside the story. On
the other hand, the final shot in the film suggests
something more. Like Pascual Aubier's 1985 short film
Flashback, in which a man's life flashes before
him in reverse all the way back to infancy, so, too,
can Peppermint Candy's trip into the past be
considered in some sense, Yong-Ho's spiritual journey
backwards to reclaim his lost innocence. In the film's
final, moving shot there is a sense that Yong-Ho is
overwhelmed by the scene's beauty, yet prior to that
moment, there is also the suggestion that he is experiencing
a case of déjà vu. The ambiguity of exactly
what is going through Yong-Ho's mind in this moment
of realization gives the film an extra dimension and
creates a jumping-off point for viewers to debate the
film's ending.
Sul Kyung-Gu is a revelation
as Yong-Ho. He effectively portrays the character as
a slightly different kind of man in each episode, although
always rooted to a core personality. At times, the character
is like a wild animal, prone to outbursts of violence
at seemingly any moment, a characteristic which Sul
would revisit in later films like Public Enemy
and Rikidozan. As the sole anchor of the film,
Sul Kyung-Gu is a magnetic presence, holding the viewer's
attention throughout the narrative.
Although Peppermint
Candy suggests that Yong-Ho's journey into darkness
was a gradual decline, it could also be argued that
his innocence was lost in a single instant and completely
by accident. Certainly, his reaction to that traumatic
event and the choices he made in its aftermath put him
on the road to becoming the the tragic monster seen
in the film's opening scene, but the film also suggests
that who we are depends not just on choice, but chance.
Intellectually-stimulating and heartbreaking to the
last, Peppermint Candy is undoubtedly a modern
classic of Korean cinema. (Calvin McMillin, 2005) |
|